Such a bizarre case
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1375264/posts
"When the issue surfaced last year, Mr. Berger insisted that he had removed the classified material inadvertently. But in the plea agreement reached with prosecutors, he is expected to admit that he intentionally removed copies of five classified documents, destroyed three and misled staff members at the National Archives when confronted about it,..." (emphasis added by Vox)
Read his explanation in the last 3 paragraphs of the article. Classic.
Keep in mind that he was "reviewing" this material for his appearance before the 9/11 Commission. The 9/11 Commission! Oh, my bad, I thought that had some significance or something. Talk about a media black-out. - Vox
"When the issue surfaced last year, Mr. Berger insisted that he had removed the classified material inadvertently. But in the plea agreement reached with prosecutors, he is expected to admit that he intentionally removed copies of five classified documents, destroyed three and misled staff members at the National Archives when confronted about it,..." (emphasis added by Vox)
Read his explanation in the last 3 paragraphs of the article. Classic.
Keep in mind that he was "reviewing" this material for his appearance before the 9/11 Commission. The 9/11 Commission! Oh, my bad, I thought that had some significance or something. Talk about a media black-out. - Vox
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home